The AS5047U driver uses CRTP (Curiously Recurring Template Pattern) for hardware abstraction. This design choice provides several critical benefits for embedded systems:
Why CRTP Instead of Virtual Functions?
1. Zero Runtime Overhead
Virtual functions: Require a vtable lookup (indirect call) = ~5-10 CPU cycles overhead per call
CRTP: Direct function calls = 0 overhead, compiler can inline
Impact: In time-critical embedded code reading angles at high rates, this matters significantly
2. Compile-Time Polymorphism
Virtual functions: Runtime dispatch - the compiler cannot optimize across the abstraction boundary
CRTP: Compile-time dispatch - full optimization, dead code elimination, constant propagation
Impact: Smaller code size, faster execution
3. Memory Efficiency
Virtual functions: Each object needs a vtable pointer (4-8 bytes)
CRTP: No vtable pointer needed
Impact: Critical in memory-constrained systems (many MCUs have <64KB RAM)
4. Type Safety
Virtual functions: Runtime errors if method not implemented
CRTP: Compile-time errors if method not implemented
Impact: Catch bugs at compile time, not in the field
How CRTP Works
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
// Base template class (from as5047u_spi_interface.hpp)template<typenameDerived>classSpiInterface{public:voidtransfer(constuint8_t*tx,uint8_t*rx,std::size_tlen){// Cast 'this' to Derived* and call the derived implementationstatic_cast<Derived*>(this)->transfer(tx,rx,len);}};// Your implementationclassMySPI:publicas5047u::SpiInterface<MySPI>{public:// This method is called directly (no virtual overhead)voidtransfer(constuint8_t*tx,uint8_t*rx,std::size_tlen){// Your platform-specific SPI code}};
The key insight: static_cast<Derived*>(this) allows the base class to call methods on the derived class at compile time, not runtime.
Performance Comparison
Aspect
Virtual Functions
CRTP
Function call overhead
~5-10 cycles
0 cycles (inlined)
Code size
Larger (vtables)
Smaller (optimized)
Memory per object
+4-8 bytes (vptr)
0 bytes
Compile-time checks
No
Yes
Optimization
Limited
Full
Interface Definition
The AS5047U driver requires you to implement the following interface:
#include<SPI.h>
#include"as5047u_spi_interface.hpp"classArduinoSPIBus:publicas5047u::SpiInterface<ArduinoSPIBus>{private:uint8_tcs_pin_;public:ArduinoSPIBus(uint8_tcs_pin):cs_pin_(cs_pin){pinMode(cs_pin_,OUTPUT);digitalWrite(cs_pin_,HIGH);}voidtransfer(constuint8_t*tx,uint8_t*rx,std::size_tlen){// Begin transaction with AS5047U settingsSPI.beginTransaction(SPISettings(4000000,MSBFIRST,SPI_MODE1));// Assert CSdigitalWrite(cs_pin_,LOW);// Transfer datafor(size_ti=0;i<len;i++){uint8_tbyte=SPI.transfer(tx?tx[i]:0);if(rx){rx[i]=byte;}}// Deassert CSdigitalWrite(cs_pin_,HIGH);// End transactionSPI.endTransaction();}};
Common Pitfalls
❌ Don’t Use Virtual Functions
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
// WRONG - defeats the purpose of CRTPclassMyBus:publicas5047u::SpiInterface<MyBus>{public:virtualvoidtransfer(...)override{// ❌ Virtual keyword not needed// ...}};
✅ Correct CRTP Implementation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
// CORRECT - no virtual keywordclassMyBus:publicas5047u::SpiInterface<MyBus>{public:voidtransfer(...){// ✅ Direct implementation// ...}};
// CORRECT - pass your class as template parameterclassMyBus:publicas5047u::SpiInterface<MyBus>{// ✅// ...};
⚠️ Important: AS5047U SPI Pin Mapping
The AS5047U uses a unique SPI pin mapping:
MCU MOSI → AS5047U MISO (data from MCU to sensor)
MCU MISO → AS5047U MOSI (data from sensor to MCU)
This is opposite to standard SPI naming. Make sure your wiring matches this!
Testing Your Implementation
After implementing the interface, test it:
1
2
3
4
5
6
MyPlatformSPIspi(/* your config */);as5047u::AS5047Uencoder(spi,FrameFormat::SPI_24);// Test basic operationsuint16_tangle=encoder.GetAngle();uint8_tagc=encoder.GetAGC();